writrun.
Sample reportTrustAbout
Request an invitation
writrun.

Public-records asset reports for creditor's-rights firms. Source-cited. Defensible. 24-hour turnaround.

Public records only — no GLBA or DPPA-restricted data.

Product

  • Pricing
  • Sample report
  • Trust
  • Security

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Acceptable use
  • Subprocessors
© 2026 HazyCapital Inc. All rights reserved.
Public records only

Writrun is a software product operated by HazyCapital Inc. and is not a law firm or a consumer reporting agency under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. §1681 et seq.). Reports are research aids drawn from publicly available records and may not be used for employment, tenant, credit, or insurance decisions, or for any other FCRA-covered purpose. Nothing on this site or in a Writrun report constitutes legal advice.

Private engagement · By invitation

Most judgments are uncollected, not uncollectable.

Send us the files your firm has stopped chasing. We'll find the assets the debtor never disclosed — and show you how to turn the judgment into money.

Writrun reads federal contracts, SEC filings, bankruptcy dockets, and business affiliations the debtor never produced. Our team works the research, presents the findings, and walks your attorneys through where to direct the next writ. No portal to learn, no software to roll out.

Request an invitationSee a sample report

Public records only — no GLBA-restricted databases

report · WR-1042-TX
SubjectR. Alvarez (Hidalgo Cty., TX)Judgment $42,800 · Cause No. 2022-CV-04417
Recovery score72High confidence
Real property2 parcels · Hidalgo CAD · est. $186K combined
Highhidalgocad.org
Vehicles & UCC liens1 vehicle, 0 active liens · TX SOS UCC
Highsos.state.tx.us
Bankruptcy historyNo filings (PACER, last 10 yrs)
Highpacer.uscourts.gov
Generated 2026-04-12 · 14 sources cited
SLOL: clear
  • Public records only
  • Source-cited
  • No debtor contact
  • 24-hour turnaround
The opportunity

Most judgments don't fail at trial. They fail at enforcement.

The biggest hole in a creditor's-rights firm's revenue isn't a slow trial calendar — it's the dormant judgment file. Debtors don't volunteer where their money is. Writrun reads what they never disclosed — federal-contract income, insider holdings, registered business affiliations — and tells your team where to direct the next writ.

70%+Of money judgments go unsatisfiedFTC + NY Fed Consumer Credit Panel
$23kTypical commercial-judgment valueMid-market B2B, 2024 caselaw averages
33%Typical contingency on recoveryPost-judgment enforcement engagement
6Public-record sources we pullEDGAR · USASpending · GLEIF · CourtListener · ProPublica · OFAC
Worked example

One additional collected judgment changes the conversation.

A mid-size collections firm with 100 dormant commercial judgments at $23k average is sitting on $2.3M of stranded value. If our research surfaces enforceable assets on just three of them in a month at 33% contingency, that's $22,770 of new revenue the firm wasn't going to bill — pulled from files already in the system.

At the firm level, the calculus collapses to one question: how many of your dormant files have an asset you haven't found yet? Even at a 3% hit rate on the dormant book, the math dwarfs the engagement.

Revenue scenarios, per month
3 collected commercial judgments$23k × 3 × 33% contingency
$22,770
1 collected commercial judgment$23k × 1 × 33% contingency
$7,590
Median consumer judgment win$4.8k × 1 × 33% contingency
$1,584
Dormant book at 3% recovery hit-rate100 files × 3% × $23k × 33%
$22,770
And the staff hours we give back

Triaging a single dormant judgment in-house runs three to five hours of paralegal time.

That's $420 to $700 in loaded staff cost per matter — before anyone files a writ. We do the same triage work for you, in parallel across the whole dormant book, with every fact source-cited and timestamped. Your paralegals get their week back; the partners get a queue ordered by recovery probability instead of intake date.

Hours back per matter3–5 hrsOf paralegal triage replaced, per file
How the engagement works

A research team for your dormant judgment book.

You don't log into a portal or learn a new tool. You hand us the judgments your firm has stopped pursuing and we hand back the findings — presented, defensible, and ready for the next enforcement decision.

  1. 01

    You send us the files you've stopped chasing

    Pick the dormant judgments — the ones sitting in your firm's system that nobody has the hours to actively work. Old defaults, write-off candidates, post-bankruptcy survivors. Whatever your team would otherwise leave on the shelf.

  2. 02

    Our team produces the research

    Our analysts read federal-contract awards, SEC officer filings, business registrations, bankruptcy dockets, and sanctions lists for each debtor. Every fact is captured with a source URL and a retrieval timestamp.

  3. 03

    We present the findings to your firm

    Each batch comes back as a source-cited recovery report, walked through live with your attorneys: where the assets are, what the recovery score reflects, and what enforcement order we'd file next.

  4. 04

    You decide what to enforce

    Your firm pulls forward the matters that are now collectible and writes off the ones that genuinely aren't. Most engagements expand from there — fresh judgments queued in, re-pulls before writ filings, ongoing presentation cadence.

What's in a report

Six sections. Each one tells your team where to direct enforcement.

The report is structured around the four actions a creditor's firm actually takes after judgment: garnish, attach, screen, defend. Plus the recovery score that decides whether to do any of those at all.

Where to focus

Recovery score with rationale

A 0–100 probability score with the contributing factors itemized. Tells the firm which judgments in the dormant book are worth pulling forward — and which to write off without spending another hour.

Source: Composite, every factor cited
What you can garnish

Federal-contract income streams

Active and historical federal contracts and grants awarded to the debtor or any entity they control. Receivables and disbursements that often flow into reachable bank accounts.

Source: USASpending.gov
What you can attach

Business affiliations & insider holdings

Officer, director, and beneficial-owner roles in public companies and registered entities, plus Legal Entity Identifier records and nonprofit affiliations. Equity, salary, and distribution exposure.

Source: SEC EDGAR · GLEIF · ProPublica
What's blocking you

Bankruptcy & litigation posture

Federal bankruptcy filings (auto-halt under 11 U.S.C. §362), civil-court history, and overlapping creditor actions. Avoid the writ you cannot legally serve, and the writ that gets you second-in-line.

Source: CourtListener (RECAP archive)
What's risky

Sanctions & screening exposure

OFAC consolidated screening hits and trade-restriction flags. Material for fee applications, KYC for judgment buyers, and disengagement triggers when the matter exceeds the firm's risk appetite.

Source: OFAC · Trade.gov consolidated lists
What survives review

Sources appendix with timestamps

Every factual claim in the report carries a source URL and the retrieval timestamp. The report itself is the evidentiary record — defensible on a fee application, a Rule 11 challenge, or an internal QC review.

Source: All sources, every fact
Where Writrun fits

Your firm already has a case-management system. Writrun turns that data into enforceable collections actions at scale.

Clio, Cosmolex, CollectMax, Tabs3, your bespoke Salesforce — they track the work. They don't tell you which judgments to pursue, which to abandon, and which writ to file first. That's what we do.

What you have

Case-management system

The judgments, debtors, statuses, and contact records your firm has been collecting for years.

  • Open judgment files
  • Debtor contact details
  • Case timelines and notes
  • Existing collection statuses
What Writrun adds

Asset intelligence layer

A per-debtor recovery report grounded in federal litigation, sanctions, entity registries, and public filings — every fact cited.

  • Recovery score 0–100
  • Bankruptcy stay detection
  • Federal-award and LEI affiliations
  • Statute-of-limitations clock
What you ship

Enforceable actions

The output your paralegals and process servers can actually file — not another dashboard to log into.

  • Writ-of-execution priority list
  • Garnishment target rankings
  • Abstract-of-judgment filings
  • Charge-off recovery underwriting

No data migration · No new system of record · Export-ready output

Used by creditor's-rights firms for

The work that decides whether a judgment is worth a writ.

  • Pre-writ asset triage
  • Abstract-of-judgment scoring
  • Post-judgment discovery
  • Bankruptcy-stay screening
  • Statute-of-limitations review
  • Charge-off recovery underwriting
How Writrun compares

Honest about what each option actually does.

Skip-trace data is faster on raw individual lookups. A senior paralegal applies more judgment than software. Filing the writ is still the cheapest experiment if you only have a few matters. Writrun's claim is narrower: defensible asset triage at the matter level, sourced entirely from public records, walked through with your attorneys.

WritrunPublic-records asset report
In-house paralegal3–5 hrs of staff time
Skip-trace dataTLOxp, IRBsearch, etc.
Status quoFile the writ, find out
Source URL on every factYesPartialNoNo
Recovery score with rationaleYesNoNoNo
Statute-of-limitations mathYesYesNoNo
Bankruptcy stay screeningYesYesPartialNo
Public records only (no GLBA exposure)YesYesNoYes
Cross-debtor pattern detectionYesNoPartialNo
Defensible on Rule 11 challengeYesPartialPartialNo
FDCPA exposure (debtor contact)NoYesYesYes
Cost per dormant matter triagedQuoted$420–$700$50–$120 (sub)$200–$2,500 (filing fee)

Per-matter cost ranges reflect typical 2026 rates for a single mid-six-figure judgment in a metro county. Skip-trace pricing assumes existing subscription; status-quo cost is the writ filing fee, not the downstream enforcement cost.

By invitation

A private engagement for a small group of firms.

We're working directly with a selective group of creditor's-rights firms right now. Send us the judgments your team has stopped chasing and we'll show you, file by file, what those debtors look like in public records — and how to turn the finding into a collectible asset.

Request an invitationOnboarding firms now · Limited capacity
  • What we want

    The judgments your firm has stopped pursuing.

    Old defaults. Files that hit a dead end after the first writ came back negative. Post-bankruptcy survivors. Anything sitting in your case-management system that isn't actively being worked. Those are the matters where research moves the needle the most.

  • Why white-glove

    We work the research; your firm decides enforcement.

    No portal to roll out, no software for your paralegals to learn. Our team produces the asset reports and walks your attorneys through the findings. You keep the legal judgment calls — and a clean record of where every fact came from.

  • What we ask in return

    Honest feedback as we go.

    Tell us which findings led to recovery, which didn't, and what the report should have surfaced. That's how we build something genuinely useful for firms doing post-judgment work — and it's the entire ask.

The exploration period

See what your dormant book returns — then decide how far to take it.

Rather than ask you to commit on a pitch, we partner with your firm for a focused exploration — roughly two months — working the judgments you've already written off. You watch the findings turn into filings on your own files, then decide whether and how to keep going. No long-term contract gates the decision.

  1. Weeks 1–2

    We start on your real files

    After a short intake call you hand us a slice of your dormant judgment book. The first source-cited reports come back fast — on your actual debtors, not a canned demo — so your attorneys can act while the exploration is still young.

  2. Across the window

    You enforce; we keep researching

    Each batch is presented live: where the assets are, what's reachable, and which enforcement order we'd file next. Your firm pulls forward the collectible matters and files. We re-pull before writs and queue the next batch.

  3. Wrap-up

    We review what came back — together

    At the end of the window we sit down with the numbers: which dormant files turned collectible, what was recovered or is in motion, and what the rest of your book likely holds. You leave with a documented picture, regardless of what you decide next.

At the end, the evidence makes the case — not the sales pitch.

Some firms expand into an ongoing arrangement with fresh judgments queued in and a standing presentation cadence. A few decide the timing isn't right, and that's a clean exit. Either way you keep every report we produced and a clear read on what your dormant book is worth.

Start an explorationYour files · Your enforcement calls
Sample reports

Five debtors. Same report structure. Different recommendations.

The score is a real signal — we will tell you not to pursue a judgment when the facts say so. Each card below opens the full report.

Open all samples →
  • Hidalgo Cty, TXHIGH
    $42,800 · individual
    72/ 100

    Two parcels, one operating LLC, no bankruptcy. Secondary parcel and LLC equity unencumbered.

    PursueView
  • Cobb Cty, GAHIGH
    $215,000 · LLC defendant
    88/ 100

    Operating LLC defendant, two commercial parcels, no bankruptcy. Charging-order play.

    PursueView
  • Maricopa Cty, AZMEDIUM
    $78,500 · individual
    54/ 100

    Single homesteaded residence, AZ homestead is generous, two passive LLC interests with limited assets.

    ConditionalView
  • Clark Cty, NVLOW
    $128,000 · individual
    41/ 100

    Real property transferred to NV self-settled trust 11 months pre-judgment. Fraudulent-transfer claim available but contested.

    ConditionalView
  • Broward Cty, FLDO NOT
    $33,200 · do not pursue
    12/ 100

    Active Chapter 13 case filed five months ago. 11 U.S.C. §362 automatic stay in effect.

    Do not pursueView
What attorneys tell us

The friction we hear, in their words.

Synthesised from advisory conversations with creditor's-rights attorneys at ten firms. Attribution is by role and region; named-customer references go up here once we have signed sign-offs.

  • “
    Our dormant judgment book is bigger than our active docket. Every quarter we either write the file off or hire another paralegal to chase it. A per-matter recovery score with cited assets is the third option we've been looking for.
    Managing partner, creditor's-rights practiceSun Belt mid-market firm
  • “
    Skip-trace databases give us thirty fields per debtor and zero of them tell us whether the writ will recover money. Source URLs and a recovery score are what survive a Rule 11 challenge — and tell us where the dollars actually are.
    Senior associate, judgment-enforcement groupNortheast collections firm
  • “
    The bankruptcy stay catches us once a year on a stale matter. A 24-hour federal-bankruptcy check on every judgment we touch is the kind of hygiene we should have had ten years ago.
    Of counsel, post-judgment recoverySoutheast multi-state firm
FAQ

What attorneys ask first.

Onboarding firms now

Tell us about the judgments you've stopped chasing.

More than 70% of money judgments go unsatisfied because nobody ever finds the assets. We're working with a small group of creditor's-rights firms to fix that — file by file, by hand. Send us your dormant book and we'll be in touch within one business day.

Request an invitation